 |
ReelViews: W.
Review, by James Berardinelli: "Superficial, uninformative, and inert, this two hour snoozefest isn't even inflammatory enough to stoke a righteous anti-Bush brushfire. W. does for recent history what Oliver Stone's epic "Alexander" did fo
http://www.reelviews.net/php_review_template.php?identifier=1375
Reelviews.net ~
Site Info
Whois
Trace Route
RBL Check
|
 |
Time: W.
Review, by Richard Corliss: "The movie is an X-ray of an invisible man -- by the film's end, the W. still stands for Who?"
http://www.time.com/time/arts/article/0,8599,1849848,00.html
Time.com ~
Site Info
Whois
Trace Route
RBL Check
|
 |
The Christian Science Monitor: W.
Review, by Peter Rainer: "Stone may think he's made a movie about the toxicity of the Bush presidency, but what we have instead is a cautionary tale of a decidedly lower order. As far as I can make out, the real message of W. is: Don't vote for anyb
http://www.csmonitor.com/2008/1018/p25s01-almo.html
Csmonitor.com ~
Site Info
Whois
Trace Route
RBL Check
|
 |
RogerEbert.com: W.
Review, by Roger Ebert: "W., a biography of President Bush, is fascinating. No other word for it." [Rating: 4 out of 4]
http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20081015/REVIEWS/810150285
Suntimes.com ~
Site Info
Whois
Trace Route
RBL Check
|
|
|
|
